Identifying, Engaging, and Empowering Families A Charge for Juvenile Justice Agencies

Identifying, Engaging, and Empowering Families

Overview

From arrest to probation, placement, and reentry, youth in the juvenile justice system deserve to have their families involved in their care. Studies show that kids in the system are much more likely to succeed long-term when they have frequent contact with their families. Unfortunately, juvenile justice agencies often have difficulty working with families and involving them in the decision-making process. This report offers three major steps agencies can take to improve their engagement efforts:

  1. Identification: Learning the strength of a youth’s support system and identifying as many positive adult role models as possible.
  2. Engagement: Reaching out to a youth’s support system and creating a welcoming environment.
  3. Empowerment: Consulting families at various decision-making points,
    educating families on the juvenile justice process and system, and informing them of their rights.

Key Takeaway

Youth in the juvenile justice system fare best when their families are directly involved in their care. Agencies often struggle to properly engage families, but through Identification, Engagement, and Empowerment, agencies can ensure families are involved in their youth’s juvenile justice outcomes. 

Publication Highlights

  • Kids who receive frequent visits from their parents often earn better grades, have fewer violent incidents while in custody, and have lower recidivism rates. 

  • Juvenile justice agency leaders need to send a strong, clear and consistent message about the importance of family to succeed. 

  • Family should be defined broadly to reflect all the positive people a young person can have involved in their life—including extended family, mentors, teachers, and coaches.

Key Facts

Related

The Enhanced Pre-Arraignment Screening Unit

Improving Health Services, Medical Triage, and Diversion Opportunities in Manhattan Central Booking

New York City established Pre-Arraignment Medical Screening Units (PASUs) in all boroughs’ central booking facilities, except Staten Island, as a result of a 1993 legal settlement requiring the city to establish a process for screening the health needs of people who are arrested, booked into police custody, and awaiting arraignment. Unfortunately, ...

Publication
  • David Cloud, Leah Pope, Jim Parsons, Anne Siegler, Michelle Martelle
September 20, 2017
Publication

Against the Odds

Experimenting with Alternative Forms of Bail in New York City’s Criminal Courts

Statistics show that money bail is unaffordable and out of reach for many New Yorkers. On any given day, 7,000 people are detained pretrial at Rikers Island and other New York City jails because they cannot make bail. While judges in New York can choose up to nine different forms of bail at arraignment—include “alternative” forms that require littl...

Publication
  • Insha Rahman
September 15, 2017
Publication

Closing the Distance

The Impact of Video Visits on Washington State Prisons

For people who are incarcerated, separation from family and friends is a difficult fact of life, as are the financial and logistical barriers that keep their loved ones from visiting them in prison. Because research has shown that contact with loved ones is a critical factor in improving outcomes for incarcerated people returning home, prison syste...

Publication
  • Léon Digard, Jessi LaChance, Jennifer Hill
August 15, 2017
Publication