A Generation Later What We've Learned About Zero Tolerance in Schools

Overview

Zero tolerance school discipline policies—mandating suspension or expulsion of students for misconduct—have gained tremendous momentum in middle and high schools since they were introduced in the late 1980s. This report looks at existing research to answer three questions:

  1. How does zero tolerance discipline affect individual students and the overall school environment?
  2. Have these policies helped create a school-to-prison pipeline?
  3. If the costs outweigh the benefits, are there more effective alternatives?

 The evidence concludes that neither adults nor young people have benefited from zero tolerance policies. In fact there is growing consensus that positive reinforcement is more effective, and behavioral problems should be resolved on a case-by-case basis. 

Key Takeaway

Zero tolerance policies are beneficial for neither teachers nor students. We need alternatives that keep kids safely in school. 

Publication Highlights

  • No studies have proven that an increase in student suspensions has led to a decrease in classroom disruption. 

  • Zero tolerance policies were initially designed to respond to possession of a weapon. However, in recent years, only five percent of suspensions or expulsions nationally were for this offense. 

  • Policies that require teachers or administrators to push students out of school can have life-long negative effects that severely limit a young person’s future potential.

Key Facts

Related

Series: Dispatches from Germany

Can We Learn From Our Past?

The Holocaust forced Germany to fundamentally change how it incarcerates people. In America, slavery morphed into mass incarceration.

The 13th amendment to the U.S. Constitution abolishes slavery and involuntary servitude except as punishment for a crime—a loophole that has continued the wide-scale persecution of black and brown people through the criminal justice system. The result is a U.S. prison system designed to warehouse and dehumanize people. From the length of sentences ...

Blog Post
  • Alex Frank
    Alex Frank
September 14, 2018
Blog Post

Finding housing is hard—but for people leaving prison and jail, it’s almost impossible

We need to open doors for people reentering society, not shut them.

In recent years, however, there has been growing momentum to ease restrictions around housing for formerly incarcerated individuals. In 2017, Vera launched the Opening Doors to Public Housing initiative to expand access to housing for people with conviction histories. Now, with funding from the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistan...

Blog Post
  • Jack W. Duran
    Jack W. Duran
August 30, 2018
Blog Post

Opening Doors

Safely Increasing Access to Public Housing for People with Conviction Histories

For more than 600,000 people leaving prison and the nearly 11 million cycling through jails annually, research shows that safe, affordable housing is essential for them to succeed after they are released. While all public housing authorities (PHAs) must, by law, place lifetime exclusions on people who are lifetime-registered sex offenders or who ha...

Publication
  • Brian Walsh, Jessica Jensen
August 30, 2018
Publication