Manafort’s Sentencing Highlights Problems in the Criminal Justice System—But Not In the Way Many Claim

Paul Manafort Blog Full
Lengthy sentences do not make society safer or deter crime.

The criticism of Manafort’s sentence did not stop with critiques of the troubling disparities in the criminal justice system. Many also condemned the sentence as too short. An editorial in the Boston Globe said “Talk about a slap on the wrist,” while an op-ed on written by a former federal prosecutor decried, “Simply put, Judge Ellis's sentence is an injustice. It fails to adequately punish Manafort for committing a series of deliberate crimes over many years.”

The problem, however, is not that Manafort’s sentence is too lenient—it is that other sentences in the United States are much too harsh. We think three and a half years and 47 months in prison are short sentences only because we expect such a vastly longer norm. In other countries, the expectations are different. In Germany and the Netherlands, for example, more than 90 percent of prison sentences are for two years or less. In Norway, the maximum prison sentence a person can receive for premeditated murder, no matter the number of victims, is 21 years. That’s less than the maximum the federal sentencing guidelines recommended for Manafort’s tax and bank fraud. In handing down the sentence Judge Ellis rightly recognized that our sense of an appropriate sentence is off kilter, calling the federal sentencing guidelines “excessive.” And research confirms that lengthy sentences do not make society safer or deter crime. They do, however, damage people and communities, while costing tax payers billions of dollars.

Manafort’s 47-month sentence may be an outlier in its leniency within the American system, but the answer is not to give him a longer prison sentence. Rather, everyone passing through the criminal justice system deserves a judge who thinks critically about lengthy sentencing guidelines, and provides individual consideration to that person. We do not need the courts to treat Manafort like everyone else. We need the courts to treat everyone else like a wealthy, privileged white man.


The Public Wants Stories about Criminal Justice Reform

Taking stock of the open-source podcast 70 Million and its impact as season two launches

We learned so much from our first season. We learned that there's a demand for coverage of stories that focus on actionable ideas for local criminal justice reform. We learned that digital audio is an ideal medium for disseminating these necessary stories. Every smart phone comes preloaded with a podcast app, so accessing 70 Million only requires c...

Blog Post
  • Juleyka  Lantigua Williams
    Juleyka Lantigua Williams
July 15, 2019
Blog Post

On World Population Day, We Should Reflect on Our Need to Reduce the Number of Americans Behind Bars

People in prison today suffer from punishing, harsh, and onerous conditions of confinement. There is extensive research and reporting detailing the inhumane and unsanitary conditions of many jails and prisons, as well as the physical, emotional, and mental torment of the people held in them. One example is the overuse of solitary confinement, where...

Blog Post
  • Noella Byenkya
    Noella Byenkya
  • Karina Schroeder
    Karina Schroeder
July 11, 2019
Blog Post

A Piece of the Puzzle

State Financial Aid for Incarcerated Students

Postsecondary education in prison puts people on a path toward a brighter future by disrupting the cycle of poverty and incarceration. But it has not been offered at scale due to the numerous barriers—including the 1994 ban on Pell Grants to people in prison—that prevent students and postsecondary institutions from accessing state and federal fundi...

  • Lauren Hobby, Brian Walsh, Ruth Delaney
July 11, 2019