Current Work
  • In October 2010, Vera released Getting Teenagers Back to School: Rethinking New York State's Response to Chronic Absence, a policy brief looking at New York State’s practices responding to chronically absent teenagers, particularly reporting and investigating a teen’s parent or guardian to the child protective system for allegations of educational neglect.
  • In December 2009, Vera released Rethinking Educational Neglect for Teenagers: New Strategies for New York State, which describes how the child protective system addresses educational neglect for teenagers and proposes strategies for improving the state’s response.
  • Project staff presented their findings at a statewide symposium to develop ideas for new policies and laws related to educational neglect. The symposium, convened by OCFS, brought together more than 90 participants, including family court judges, education and probation officials, social service commissioners, and service providers.
  • In partnership with state and New York City officials, Vera staff are conducting further research aimed at implementing new strategies and developing alternative approaches to educational neglect for teenagers.
Why This Work Is Important 

Educational neglect cases consume a growing portion of the child protective system’s limited resources. Between 2004 and 2008, the number of children reported for educational neglect increased by 34 percent statewide. In 2008, educational neglect had been alleged for one in every 10 children (28,401) whose parents were investigated for abuse or neglect. More than 60 percent (17,369) of these children were teenagers.

A central purpose of child protective system investigations into allegations of educational neglect is to determine whether absence from school is a symptom of abuse or neglect that threatens the child’s safety. Educational neglect reports involving teenagers generally do not present risks of future abuse, neglect, or other safety concerns. They do, however, reveal other issues which the child protective system is not well-equipped to address. These include complex educational needs, conflict between parents and teens, homelessness, and mental illness. This project has identified a strong need for more appropriate, cost-effective responses for chronically truant teenagers that can produce better outcomes for them and their families.

For more information, contact senior planning analyst Jessica Gunderson.