Unanimous Juries Bring 21st Century Justice to Louisiana

Unanimous Juries Bring 21St Century Justice To Louisiana Full
Louisiana State Penitentiary (2011)

In Louisiana, it is almost impossible to ignore the evolution of our slave plantations into prison ones. Our bail system also shares those roots.

Our state’s non-unanimous jury scheme was codified at the 1898 Louisiana Constitutional convention where leaders like Confederate Senator Thomas Semmes made their intentions clear, “to establish the supremacy of the white race in this state to the extent to which it could be legally and constitutionally done.” A product of this white supremacist convention were non-unanimous juries designed to not only make it easier to convict black people, but also nullify the vote of any black person that might make it onto a jury. And it worked. According to Tilting the Scales by The Advocate newspaper, non-unanimous verdicts not only disparately convicted black people accused of a crime, but in most cases the two not guilty votes were cast by black jurors.

As a public defender in New Orleans, I saw this all the time. In all of the 12-person jury cases where I lost at trial, there were at least two people who did not believe the prosecutor proved their case beyond a reasonable doubt and cast not guilty votes. For their ten fellow jurors, there was no need, and therefore no opportunity, for the thoughtful and meaningful deliberation required of unanimous verdicts. This non-unanimous jury scheme left many New Orleanians feeling powerless—especially the ones voting not guilty to no avail, the people on trial, and also jurors who felt implicated in a system that was less fair than the ideals we were taught growing up.

By passing this amendment, Louisiana declared it wanted a new criminal justice system—one free of its racist roots and in line with protecting individual freedom and liberty for everyone.

The risk to justice is real. Since 1989, at least 12 people in Louisiana have been exonerated who were convicted by a non-unanimous verdict—and there may be more.

In June 2018, Senator JP Morrell led the state legislature sending this fundamental issue of justice to the people to approve a constitutional amendment.

The Unanimous Jury Coalition—a collaborative of community members, nonprofits and legal advocates quickly formed to join forces and rally support for Amendment #2. As a volunteer, I joined arms with my neighbors in this effort not only in honor of those I knew directly impacted by this law but also to prevent further incidences of unfairness at trial. Through the hard work of the coalition and many others, awareness and support grew in barber shops and salons, law schools and universities. More than 75 percent of voters in the City of New Orleans approved Amendment #2, and the amendment passed in all but three of the state’s 64 parishes.

Now, prosecutors will have to meet their burden of proving their case beyond the reasonable doubt of 12 people arrived at through meaningful deliberation.

By passing this amendment, Louisiana declared it wanted a new criminal justice system—one free of its racist roots and in line with protecting individual freedom and liberty for everyone. Today, the scales of justice are a little more balanced in the State of Louisiana.


Crisis Response Services for People with Mental Illnesses or Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

A Review of the Literature on Police-based and Other First Response Models

The Vera Institute of Justice (Vera) launched Serving Safely in May 2018 as a national initiative to improve police responses to people with serious mental illnesses (SMI) and intellectual/developmental disabilities (I/DD). The initiative’s Research and Evaluation Committee developed this literature review as a first step toward creating a research...

  • Leah Pope
October 30, 2019