- About Us
- Services
-
Programs
- Programs Home
- Center on Immigration and Justice
- Center on Sentencing and Corrections
- Center on Victimization and Safety
- Center on Youth Justice
- Cost-Benefit Analysis Unit
- Family Justice Program
- International Program
- Prosecution and Racial Justice Program
- Substance Use and Mental Health Program
- Adolescent Portable Therapy
- Common Justice
- The Guardianship Project
- Experts
- Topics
- Blog
- Resources
- Newsroom
Blogs / mjacobson's blog posts / Federal Sentencing Reporter
Home /
Blogs /
mjacobson's blog posts
Home
/Blogs
/mjacobson's blog posts
Home
Blogs
mjacobson's blog posts
Federal Sentencing Reporter
Projects
- Accessing Safety Initiative
- Adolescent Portable Therapy
- Anatomy of Discretion Project
- A Natural Experiment in Reform: Analyzing Drug Policy Change in New York
- Child Welfare Case Processing in New York City Family Courts
- Close to Home
- Commission on Safety and Abuse in America's Prisons
- Common Justice
- Comprehensive Transition Planning Project
- Corrections Support and Accountability Project
- Cost-Benefit Analysis of Programs for Court-Involved Youth in New York
- Cost-Benefit Analysis of Raising the Age of Juvenile Jurisdiction in North Carolina
- Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Center for Employment Opportunities
- Developing and Sharing Juvenile Justice Data in New York State
- Educational Neglect
- Engaging Police in Immigrant Communities (EPIC)
- Federal Sentencing Reporter
- Governor Paterson's Task Force on Juvenile Justice
- Guardianship Project
- Justice Reinvestment Initiative
- Juvenile and Criminal Justice System Data Indicators Project
- Knowledge Bank for Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Justice
- Legal Orientation Program
- Legal Reform in China
- Los Angeles Jail to Community Reentry Project
- Models for Change Initiative
- National Immigrant Victims' Access to Justice Partnership
- National Prison Rape Elimination Commission
- New Mexico Promise for Success Initiative
- New Orleans Office
- New York City Detention Reform
- New York State Detention Assistance Program
- New York State Detention Reform 2011
- New York State Parole Project
- Ohio Green Prison Project
- Performance Incentive Funding
- Performance Incentive Funding
- Promising Practices Initiative
- Prosecution and Racial Justice
- Raising the Age of Juvenile Jurisdiction in Connecticut
- Redefining Community Supervision in Alabama
- Reducing Jail Overcrowding in Los Angeles
- Reentry Is Relational
- Segregation Reduction Project
- Sentencing and Corrections Reform in Illinois
- Sexual Violence Prevention Project
- Supervised Visitation Initiative
- The Sexual Assault Forensic Protocol
- The True Cost of Prisons
- Translating Justice
- U.N. Rule of Law
- Unaccompanied Children Program
- United Communities
- Vera-Altus Justice Indicators
- Vision 21: Transforming Victim Services
About

The Federal Sentencing Reporter was launched more than two decades ago by legal experts and scholars Daniel J. Freed and Marc L. Miller, in collaboration with the Vera Institute of Justice. It is the only academic journal in the United States that focuses on sentencing law, policy, and reform.
Vera and the Federal Sentencing Reporter share an approach to policy change that relies on information, analytical examination, and innovation. Rare among scholarly journals, the Federal Sentencing Reporter focuses—in its authorship and readership—on academics as well as practitioners. In its pages, conversations take place among judges, lawyers, policy makers, and scholars. The publication is an intellectual resource that people in the field turn to for solutions and that academics rely on to propose, learn about, and discuss new ideas. Each issue offers in-depth analysis on a wide range of topics related to sentencing policies and practices.
The Federal Sentencing Reporter is published five times a year. For each issue, Vera posts on its web site the “Editor’s Observations” (a regular feature that highlights the themes of the issue), a select article, and the table of contents. Other articles, subscription services, and archives are available through University of California Press.

Current Issue: Volume: 24, Number: 3
February 2012
Considering Costs and Other Data
The February issue of the Federal Sentencing Reporter offers perspectives on whether and how to factor the financial cost of sentences into sentencing decisions. The Missouri Sentencing Advisory Commission’s recent decision to provide judges with a sentence’s cost and recidivism data has produced an animated debate among experts and practitioners. This debate has raised important questions about the decision’s implications, including: whether factoring in financial cost affects the retributive goal of punishment, how to ensure fairness given that judges may weigh the importance of costs differently (or not at all), whether this type of cost consideration should take place in the legislature or the judiciary, and how great an impact Missouri’s decision will have on its overall corrections budget. Also in this issue of the FSR is the United States Sentencing Commission’s Report to Congress and a review of its findings on mandatory minimum penalties in the federal criminal justice system.
Editor's Observations
Are Costs a Unique (And Uniquely Problematic) Kind of Sentencing Data?
Doug Berman, Robert J. Watkins/Procter & Gamble Professor of Law, Ohio State University Moritz College of Law
Featured Article
How (Not) To Implement Cost as a Sentencing Factor
Ryan W. Scott, Associate Professor of Law, Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Summary
While Missouri’s decision to make cost data available for judges’ consideration in sentencing is well-intentioned, the author argues, the policy’s approach is unlikely to result in the desired impact on the state’s corrections budget. Given that judges are not required to consider cost data in a sentence, Missouri’s policy may also lead to an increased level of disparity in sentencing decisions.
The article calls for a systemic rather than case-by-case approach to the use of cost considerations. To relieve both prison overcrowding and state budget pressures, the author recommends that Missouri follow Minnesota’s lead. There, the legislature instructs the state sentencing commission to take resource availability into consideration when designing its guidelines, which are presumptive rather than voluntary. This model would limit judicial discretion but allows for a sentencing policy that consistently accounts for the cost of incarceration.
Other articles in this issue
(available through University of California Press)
- Missouri Provides Cost of Sentences and Recidivism Data: What Does Cost Have to Do with Justice?
Michael A. Wolff , Professor of Law and Co-director of the Center for the Interdisciplinary Study of Law at the St. Louis University School of Law
- Cost and Sentencing: Some Pragmatic and Institutional Doubts
Chad W. Flanders, Assistant Professor of Law, St. Louis University School of Law
- Follow the Leader: The Advisability and Propriety of Considering Cost and Recidivism Data at Sentencing
Lynn S. Branham, Visiting Professor of Law, St. Louis University School of Law
- Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer Speaks at the American Lawyer/National Law Journal Summit
Lanny A. Breuer, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division
- Letter to AAG Breuer responding to speech
Federal Public Defenders
- Report to Congress: Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System
United States Sentencing Commission
- Review of U.S. Sentencing Commission's Report to Congress: Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System
Paul J. Hofer, Sentencing Policy Analyst, Federal Public and Community Defenders; Adjunct Assistant Professor, Johns Hopkins University
- Weinstein on Sentencing
Kate Stith, Lafayette S. Foster Professor of Law, Yale Law School
- Punitiveness Towards Users of Illicit Drugs: A Disparity between Actual and Perceived Attitudes
Matthew B. Kugler, Postdoctoral Research Associate, Lehigh University; John M. Darley, Warren Professor of Psychology, Princeton University
Blog
-
Guest blogger Marilyn M. Brown, associate professor of sociology at the University of Hawai‛i at Hilo, joins the conversation on how putting people behind bars tears at the family fabric.
Scholars, practitioners, and justice advocates have extensively examined the corrosive impact of mass incarceration on families and communities. The inclusion of family impact statements into the justice equation, as reported by Vera, signals a welcome confluence of empirical research and criminal justice agency practice. Decision-makers in the criminal justice system have been too willing to use incarceration as a sanction of first resort, with little eye to the costs involved.
topics:Children, Youth, and Family -
Guest blogger Nancy Loucks finds inspiration in U.S. jurisdictions’ efforts to take families of both the responsible and harmed parties into consideration at sentencing.
As the chief executive of Families Outside, a national Scottish charity that works on behalf of children and families affected by imprisonment, I found the recent article on the San Francisco Adult Probation Department’s family-focused approach to probation a breath of fresh air.
topics:Children, Youth, and Family -
When states impose fees and fines on people involved in the criminal justice system, the consequences can be harmful and lasting.
Editor’s note: Rebekah Diller is deputy director of the Justice Program at the NYU School of Law’s Brennan Center for Justice. She responds here to “The Unintended Sentence of Criminal Justice Debt,” an article in the October issue of Federal Sentencing Reporter.
topics:Court Systems -
For the October issue of FSR, Vera staff, alumni, and associates wrote about collateral penalties for people involved in the justice system.
Even if you have never read the journal Federal Sentencing Reporter (FSR), I urge you to have a look at the October issue. Earlier this year, the journal’s editors invited Vera to plan and coordinate a special edition—serendipitously, the invitation came just as we began celebrating our 50th anniversary.
topics:Court Systems
Featured Expert
-
Associate Director, Center on Sentencing and Corrections

