- About Us
- Services
-
Programs
- Programs Home
- Center on Immigration and Justice
- Center on Sentencing and Corrections
- Center on Victimization and Safety
- Center on Youth Justice
- Cost-Benefit Analysis Unit
- Family Justice Program
- International Program
- Prosecution and Racial Justice Program
- Substance Use and Mental Health Program
- Adolescent Portable Therapy
- Common Justice
- The Guardianship Project
- Experts
- Topics
- Blog
- Resources
- Newsroom
Home / Educational Neglect
HomeEducational Neglect
Home
Home
Home
Educational Neglect
Projects
- Accessing Safety Initiative
- Adolescent Portable Therapy
- Anatomy of Discretion Project
- A Natural Experiment in Reform: Analyzing Drug Policy Change in New York
- Child Welfare Case Processing in New York City Family Courts
- Close to Home
- Commission on Safety and Abuse in America's Prisons
- Common Justice
- Comprehensive Transition Planning Project
- Corrections Support and Accountability Project
- Cost-Benefit Analysis of Programs for Court-Involved Youth in New York
- Cost-Benefit Analysis of Raising the Age of Juvenile Jurisdiction in North Carolina
- Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Center for Employment Opportunities
- Developing and Sharing Juvenile Justice Data in New York State
- Educational Neglect
- Engaging Police in Immigrant Communities (EPIC)
- Federal Sentencing Reporter
- Governor Paterson's Task Force on Juvenile Justice
- Guardianship Project
- Justice Reinvestment Initiative
- Juvenile and Criminal Justice System Data Indicators Project
- Knowledge Bank for Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Justice
- Legal Orientation Program
- Legal Reform in China
- Los Angeles Jail to Community Reentry Project
- Models for Change Initiative
- National Immigrant Victims' Access to Justice Partnership
- National Prison Rape Elimination Commission
- New Mexico Promise for Success Initiative
- New Orleans Office
- New York City Detention Reform
- New York State Detention Assistance Program
- New York State Detention Reform 2011
- New York State Parole Project
- Ohio Green Prison Project
- Performance Incentive Funding
- Performance Incentive Funding
- Promising Practices Initiative
- Prosecution and Racial Justice
- Raising the Age of Juvenile Jurisdiction in Connecticut
- Redefining Community Supervision in Alabama
- Reducing Jail Overcrowding in Los Angeles
- Reentry Is Relational
- Segregation Reduction Project
- Sentencing and Corrections Reform in Illinois
- Sexual Violence Prevention Project
- Supervised Visitation Initiative
- The Sexual Assault Forensic Protocol
- The True Cost of Prisons
- Translating Justice
- U.N. Rule of Law
- Unaccompanied Children Program
- United Communities
- Vera-Altus Justice Indicators
- Vision 21: Transforming Victim Services
In the News
"NY study says punishment doesn't solve absenteeism"
CBS New York
Nov. 27, 2010
"Punishing parents won't solve chronic absenteeism"
Huffington Post
Nov.27, 2010
"NY study says punishment doesn't solve absenteeism"
Wall Street Journal
Nov. 27, 2010
"Punishing parents doesn't solve NYC absenteeism: study"
NBC New York
Nov. 27, 2010
"NY study says punishment doensn't solve absenteeism"
Syracuse.com
Nov. 27, 2010
About This Project

In half of U.S. states and the District of Columbia, a parent who does not ensure that his or her child attends school regularly can be charged with educational neglect and referred to child protective services. Most of these cases in New York State involve teenagers, even though experts and current research agree that the child protective system is not well equipped to address teenage absenteeism. Vera is working with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS) to study and improve the government’s response to these cases, with support from Casey Family Programs.
Current Work
- In October 2010, Vera released Getting Teenagers Back to School: Rethinking New York State's Response to Chronic Absence, a policy brief looking at New York State’s practices responding to chronically absent teenagers, particularly reporting and investigating a teen’s parent or guardian to the child protective system for allegations of educational neglect.
- In December 2009, Vera released Rethinking Educational Neglect for Teenagers: New Strategies for New York State, which describes how the child protective system addresses educational neglect for teenagers and proposes strategies for improving the state’s response.
- Project staff presented their findings at a statewide symposium to develop ideas for new policies and laws related to educational neglect. The symposium, convened by OCFS, brought together more than 90 participants, including family court judges, education and probation officials, social service commissioners, and service providers.
- In partnership with state and New York City officials, Vera staff are conducting further research aimed at implementing new strategies and developing alternative approaches to educational neglect for teenagers.
Why This Work Is Important
Educational neglect cases consume a growing portion of the child protective system’s limited resources. Between 2004 and 2008, the number of children reported for educational neglect increased by 34 percent statewide. In 2008, educational neglect had been alleged for one in every 10 children (28,401) whose parents were investigated for abuse or neglect. More than 60 percent (17,369) of these children were teenagers.
A central purpose of child protective system investigations into allegations of educational neglect is to determine whether absence from school is a symptom of abuse or neglect that threatens the child’s safety. Educational neglect reports involving teenagers generally do not present risks of future abuse, neglect, or other safety concerns. They do, however, reveal other issues which the child protective system is not well-equipped to address. These include complex educational needs, conflict between parents and teens, homelessness, and mental illness. This project has identified a strong need for more appropriate, cost-effective responses for chronically truant teenagers that can produce better outcomes for them and their families.
For more information, contact senior planning analyst Jessica Gunderson.
Resources
Blog
-
Teens chronically cut school for a lot of reasons, but they're usually making the decision themselves. So why has the response so often been to penalize the families?
Complex problems often get superficial, even frivolous treatment in the media. Not so with a terrific story on the Huffington Post about the complexities surrounding teenage chronic absenteeism—a problem that plagues school systems nationwide yet has no effective antidote to date. For example, in the 2007-2008 year approximately 40 percent of high schoolers about 140,000 teens, missed over a month of school in New York City.
topics:Children, Youth, and Family

