- About Us
- Services
-
Programs
- Programs Home
- Center on Immigration and Justice
- Center on Sentencing and Corrections
- Center on Victimization and Safety
- Center on Youth Justice
- Cost-Benefit Analysis Unit
- Family Justice Program
- International Program
- Prosecution and Racial Justice Program
- Substance Use and Mental Health Program
- Adolescent Portable Therapy
- Common Justice
- The Guardianship Project
- Experts
- Topics
- Blog
- Resources
- Newsroom
Home / Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Center for Employment Opportunities
HomeCost-Benefit Analysis of the Center for Employment Opportunities
Home / Centers & Programs / Cost-Benefit Analysis Unit / Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Center for Employment Opportunities
Home
Home
Home
Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Center for Employment Opportunities
Projects
- Accessing Safety Initiative
- Adolescent Portable Therapy
- Anatomy of Discretion Project
- A Natural Experiment in Reform: Analyzing Drug Policy Change in New York
- Child Welfare Case Processing in New York City Family Courts
- Close to Home
- Commission on Safety and Abuse in America's Prisons
- Common Justice
- Comprehensive Transition Planning Project
- Corrections Support and Accountability Project
- Cost-Benefit Analysis of Programs for Court-Involved Youth in New York
- Cost-Benefit Analysis of Raising the Age of Juvenile Jurisdiction in North Carolina
- Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Center for Employment Opportunities
- Developing and Sharing Juvenile Justice Data in New York State
- Educational Neglect
- Engaging Police in Immigrant Communities (EPIC)
- Federal Sentencing Reporter
- Governor Paterson's Task Force on Juvenile Justice
- Guardianship Project
- Justice Reinvestment Initiative
- Juvenile and Criminal Justice System Data Indicators Project
- Knowledge Bank for Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Justice
- Legal Orientation Program
- Legal Reform in China
- Los Angeles Jail to Community Reentry Project
- Models for Change Initiative
- National Immigrant Victims' Access to Justice Partnership
- National Prison Rape Elimination Commission
- New Mexico Promise for Success Initiative
- New Orleans Office
- New York City Detention Reform
- New York State Detention Assistance Program
- New York State Detention Reform 2011
- New York State Parole Project
- Ohio Green Prison Project
- Performance Incentive Funding
- Performance Incentive Funding
- Promising Practices Initiative
- Prosecution and Racial Justice
- Raising the Age of Juvenile Jurisdiction in Connecticut
- Redefining Community Supervision in Alabama
- Reducing Jail Overcrowding in Los Angeles
- Reentry Is Relational
- Segregation Reduction Project
- Sentencing and Corrections Reform in Illinois
- Sexual Violence Prevention Project
- Supervised Visitation Initiative
- The Sexual Assault Forensic Protocol
- The True Cost of Prisons
- Translating Justice
- U.N. Rule of Law
- Unaccompanied Children Program
- United Communities
- Vera-Altus Justice Indicators
- Vision 21: Transforming Victim Services
Archived Project
About This Project

>Vera's Cost-Benefit Analysis Unit worked with MDRC to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of the Center for Employment Opportunities, an independent program launched by the Vera Institute that provides employment services to people with criminal records.
The Center for Employment Opportunities (CEO) is one of the largest and best-known employment programs for the formerly incarcerated. It is one of four sites in the Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ Demonstration and Evaluation Project, funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Labor. MDRC conducted a random assignment evaluation of the program and found that it achieves a significant reduction in recidivism rates and a small improvement in several employment outcomes. The Cost-Benefit Analysis Unit drew on these evaluation results to determine if savings from lower recidivism rates and higher employment rates outweigh the costs of CEO.
Why This Project Matters
At a time when two-thirds of people released from prison are re-arrested and half are re-incarcerated within three years, investing in proven reentry programs can enhance public safety and cut costs. Yet there are few studies to help policymakers identify and support cost-effective reentry programs. Vera’s analysis will help fill this gap, providing information about the relative costs and benefits of an employment program for formerly incarcerated individuals.
For more information about cost-benefit analysis, contact tchiu@vera.org.
Resources
Blog
-
Given that more than two thirds of people released from U.S. prisons are rearrested within three years, it is essential to invest in programs that can enhance public safety and cut costs. To help policymakers identify which reentry programs are cost-effective, Vera is partnering with MDRC to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of the Center for Employment Opportunities.
by Valerie Levshin, research associate
topics:Cost-Benefit Analysis
Featured Expert
-
Director of Technical Assistance

