- About Us
- Services
-
Programs
- Programs Home
- Center on Immigration and Justice
- Center on Sentencing and Corrections
- Center on Victimization and Safety
- Center on Youth Justice
- Cost-Benefit Analysis Unit
- Family Justice Program
- International Program
- Prosecution and Racial Justice Program
- Substance Use and Mental Health Program
- Adolescent Portable Therapy
- Common Justice
- The Guardianship Project
- Experts
- Topics
- Blog
- Resources
- Newsroom
Home / Common Justice
HomeCommon Justice
Home
Home
Home
Common Justice
Projects
- Accessing Safety Initiative
- Adolescent Portable Therapy
- Anatomy of Discretion Project
- A Natural Experiment in Reform: Analyzing Drug Policy Change in New York
- Child Welfare Case Processing in New York City Family Courts
- Close to Home
- Commission on Safety and Abuse in America's Prisons
- Common Justice
- Comprehensive Transition Planning Project
- Corrections Support and Accountability Project
- Cost-Benefit Analysis of Programs for Court-Involved Youth in New York
- Cost-Benefit Analysis of Raising the Age of Juvenile Jurisdiction in North Carolina
- Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Center for Employment Opportunities
- Developing and Sharing Juvenile Justice Data in New York State
- Educational Neglect
- Engaging Police in Immigrant Communities (EPIC)
- Federal Sentencing Reporter
- Governor Paterson's Task Force on Juvenile Justice
- Guardianship Project
- Justice Reinvestment Initiative
- Juvenile and Criminal Justice System Data Indicators Project
- Knowledge Bank for Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Justice
- Legal Orientation Program
- Legal Reform in China
- Los Angeles Jail to Community Reentry Project
- Models for Change Initiative
- National Immigrant Victims' Access to Justice Partnership
- National Prison Rape Elimination Commission
- New Mexico Promise for Success Initiative
- New Orleans Office
- New York City Detention Reform
- New York State Detention Assistance Program
- New York State Detention Reform 2011
- New York State Parole Project
- Ohio Green Prison Project
- Performance Incentive Funding
- Performance Incentive Funding
- Promising Practices Initiative
- Prosecution and Racial Justice
- Raising the Age of Juvenile Jurisdiction in Connecticut
- Redefining Community Supervision in Alabama
- Reducing Jail Overcrowding in Los Angeles
- Reentry Is Relational
- Segregation Reduction Project
- Sentencing and Corrections Reform in Illinois
- Sexual Violence Prevention Project
- Supervised Visitation Initiative
- The Sexual Assault Forensic Protocol
- The True Cost of Prisons
- Translating Justice
- U.N. Rule of Law
- Unaccompanied Children Program
- United Communities
- Vera-Altus Justice Indicators
- Vision 21: Transforming Victim Services
About This Project

Common Justice offers an alternative to the traditional court process for youth charged with felonies such as assault, robbery, and burglary. Project staff bring together people immediately affected by a crime to acknowledge the harm done, address the needs of the harmed party, and agree on sanctions other than incarceration to hold the responsible party accountable. The project, based in Brooklyn, New York, seeks to repair harm, break cycles of violence, and decrease the system’s heavy reliance on incarceration.
Modeling Participatory Justice
Common Justice uses the principles of participatory justice—often called restorative justice—which has been shown to meet the needs of victims, reduce recidivism, and improve satisfaction with the justice system.
- Creating Accountability: The project gives responsible parties an opportunity to meet face-to-face with harmed parties, recognize the harm committed, and agree on how it should be addressed. Afterward, project staff monitor responsible parties as they complete sanctions resulting from the process, which may include financial restitution, community service, and/or educational programming. If the sanction agreement is fulfilled, responsible parties are not sent to jail or prison.
- Repairing Individual Harm: Common Justice offers harmed individuals a process that focuses on their needs and asks them to participate in determining the case outcome. Staff connect harmed parties with services, such as job training, educational courses, and counseling, to address immediate and long-term needs.
- Healing Communities: For cases in which incarceration does not serve the public interest, Common Justice provides a safe and effective alternative sanction that seeks to repair rather than sever communal ties in the aftermath of serious crime. By encouraging dialogue and providing needed services, the project aims to address the underlying causes of violence and begin a long-term process of transformation for individuals and communities.
Why We Need This Project
The traditional court process is poorly equipped to address the material, emotional, and social needs associated with some serious crime. It relies heavily on incarceration, which is costly and often perpetuates a cycle of violence and re-offending and fails to meet the needs of people who have been harmed by criminal acts. Those who are statistically at greatest risk of being harmed by violent crime, young men of color, are particularly unlikely to receive services in the aftermath. Common Justice works closely with this population and offers a new model for responding to harm that is cost-effective, equitable, and addresses the need for healing.
For more information, contact project director Danielle Sered.
Watch a video about Common Justice from 2009.
Common Justice operates with the generous support of the Blue Ridge Foundation, the Jacob and Valeria Langeloth Foundation, the Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Foundation, the Viola W. Bernard Foundation, the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, the Stoneleigh Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
Blog
-
How do we address the disturbing fact that although they're seeking help and healing, crime victims often report being traumatized by their experience with the police and the courts?
For victims of violent crime, what are the routes to emotional and mental health? At Vera, where we have long been involved in improving the outcomes for crime victims, a recent review of the research evidence has shown that a guilty verdict against the perpetrator is no cure-all for the harmed person.
topics:Crime and Victimization
Staff
Danielle Sered
-
Director, Common Justice
Sydney McKinney
-
Research Associate, Common Justice
Victor Marte
-
Case Coordinator, Common Justice
Shameeka Mattis
-
Manager of Client Services, Common Justice
Marc Washington
-
Case Coordinator, Common Justice

