- About Us
- Services
-
Programs
- Programs Home
- Center on Immigration and Justice
- Center on Sentencing and Corrections
- Center on Victimization and Safety
- Center on Youth Justice
- Cost-Benefit Analysis Unit
- Family Justice Program
- International Program
- Prosecution and Racial Justice Program
- Substance Use and Mental Health Program
- Adolescent Portable Therapy
- Common Justice
- The Guardianship Project
- Experts
- Topics
- Blog
- Resources
- Newsroom
Blogs / kmcmahon's blog posts / Prosecution and Racial Justice Program
Home / Centers & Programs / Prosecution and Racial Justice Program
Home /
Blogs /
kmcmahon's blog posts
Home
/Blogs
/kmcmahon's blog posts
Home
Blogs
kmcmahon's blog posts
Prosecution and Racial Justice Program
About The Center
Prosecution and Racial Justice Program

Vera’s Prosecution and Racial Justice Program (PRJ) has partnered with district attorneys in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin; Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; and San Diego County, California, to pilot an internal assessment and management procedure that is helping supervisors identify evidence of possible racial or ethnic bias in their staff’s aggregate decision making and respond appropriately when it is found. The procedure seeks to buttress the integrity of judicial outcomes and build public confidence in the criminal justice process.
A New Approach to Prosecutorial Management
PRJ’s staff of researchers and former prosecutors developed a series of performance indicators—select statistics that provide insight into how a system is operating—that focus on four key discretion points in the prosecutorial process: initial case screening, charging, plea offers, and final disposition.
Taken together, the indicators describe with meaningful specificity prosecutors’ exercise of discretion at each point in the process, thus providing managers greater opportunity to assess staff performance and provide supervision. Once data has been collected and analyzed, PRJ’s process encourages district attorneys to consider implementing policy changes to address any imbalances that have been identified.
Case Study
Data revealed that Milwaukee prosecutors chose to prosecute 59 percent of white defendants charged with possession of drug paraphernalia compared to 73 percent of non-whites arrested for the same crime. Responding to this finding, District Attorney John Chisholm encouraged staff to view possession of crack cocaine paraphernalia less as a criminal matter than as evidence that the arrested individual had a problem with drug use. A new policy directed staff to decline these cases whenever it was reasonable to do so and to refer the arrested individuals to drug treatment; prosecutors who still seek to press charges must seek a supervisor’s approval. Although these policy changes do not directly focus on racial issues, soon after they were implemented the racial disparity in drug paraphernalia charges disappeared.
Why This Program is Necessary
Prosecutors in the United States have an unrivaled influence on criminal justice outcomes, making key decisions like whether to prosecute or what charges to press. Many people fear that their broad discretion may result in unfairly disparate treatment toward people of color. Statistics show that African Americans, for example, account for 39 percent of the population within the criminal justice system, even though they make up only 13 percent of the national population. In partnership with PRJ, the district attorneys of Charlotte, Milwaukee, and San Diego are working to sustain the public’s confidence in the prosecutorial process by ensuring that neither race nor ethnicity is producing inappropriate racial disparities. The new model of internal oversight they are developing will serve as an important model for prosecutors everywhere.
For more information, contact PRJ's program director, Whitney Tymas.
Projects
Projects
-
read more
Vera’s Prosecution and Racial Justice Program (PRJ) has partnered with district attorneys in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin; Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; and San Diego County, California, to pilot an internal assessment and management procedure that is helping supervisors identify evidence of possible racial or ethnic bias in their staff’s aggregate decision making and respond appropriately when it is found. The procedure seeks to buttress the integrity of judicial outcomes and build public confidence in the criminal justice process.
Resources
- 06/15/2009
Vera’s Prosecution and Racial Justice Program (PRJ) works with district attorneys and their staffs to collect and analyze data that can identify inappropriate racial disparities in prosecutorial decision making and guide corrective action when necessary. This report discusses PRJ’s methods and identifies lessons learned from its government partners in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin; Mecklenburg County (Charlotte), North Carolina; and San Diego County, California.
Blog
-
The Supreme Court took an important step today in ruling against life in prison without parole for kids convicted of violent crimes other than homicide. Now what about revisiting the thousands convicted as juveniles who are already consigned to death in prison? Today’s Supreme Court ...
Vera in the News
Staff
Besiki Kutateladze
-
Associate Research Director, Prosecution and Racial Justice
Whitney Tymas
-
Director, Prosecution and Racial Justice
Nancy Andiloro
-
Research Associate, Prosecution and Racial Justice Program
Olivia Sideman
-
Project Assistant, Government Planning and Innovation
Featured Expert
-
Associate Research Director, Prosecution and Racial Justice
Just 'Cause Newsletter
"You can't change what you don't measure."
—John Chisholm, District Attorney, Milwaukee, Wisconsin


